AI automation for science. Agents that move the work forward.
Screen Flow's AI agents read documents, check requirements, connect evidence and prepare the next step, giving researchers and institutions more time for substantive work.
Less repeated administration. More time for science.
Requirements, evidence and results are scattered across documents and systems. Researchers and reviewers spend time finding, checking and re-entering information that already exists.
AI agents carry the preparation forward. Screen Flow gathers the material, investigates gaps and coordinates checking, correction and reporting. People address the substantive questions with the relevant evidence already assembled.
Understand the requirements: What do I need to submit?
Digital Assistant NCSTE. Guidance area, through Ask about the rules.
Ask about a competition, its requirements and the documents to submit. The agent finds the relevant approved guidance, follows up where needed and explains the answer with sources you can open.
Applicants get guidance grounded in the available approved material. Questions without a supported answer remain clearly identified.
What changes for the applicant: A clearer application package, with the requirements understood before submission.
Check the application: Is this package ready for review?
AI Agent for Formal Verification. Submission, processing and the application case.
Submit the package and its competition context. The agent reads documents, tables and scans, checks the applicable requirements and scientific and technical assignment (НТЗ), and searches supporting material to resolve gaps.
The platform checks publication evidence through configured Scopus, Web of Science and КОКНВО sources, compares the substance of research with available project records and prepares a case with linked findings.
What changes for the Operator and Expert: A prepared case with evidence, contradictions and remaining questions already organized.
Correction returns to screening.
Review the evidence: What needs my judgment?
Expert Support Agent / Case Copilot. Expert workspace, through Ask about this application.
The agent investigates the current case, follows its evidence and explains findings, scientific comparisons and changes. The workspace brings related issues into one correction request and prepares the remaining decisions.
- Why is this finding unresolved?
- Which requirements depend on НТЗ?
- What changed after correction?
A corrected package is checked again, with changes highlighted. Earlier decisions remain where their grounds are unchanged. The Expert resolves the substantive questions and signs off the screening conclusion.
What changes for the Expert: Focused judgment, supported explanations and fewer repeated decisions.
Prepare council materials: Are the materials ready for council consideration?
AI Agent for NNS Preparation. Council preparation, after screening sign-off.
The signed screening dossier and the state scientific and technical expertise conclusion (ГНТЭ) become a prepared project card and draft meeting materials. The agent reads stated scores and brings missing or conflicting information into view.
Comparable scores support provisional ordering, with the original sources available. Council members retain deliberation, voting and funding decisions.
What changes for the coordinator: Meeting materials assembled from the recorded evidence, with less manual transcription.
Project approval and execution
Approval and delivery by the responsible institutions. Five AI agents connect guidance, screening, expert review, council preparation and reporting. Each stage reuses the relevant evidence and decisions already recorded.
Review the research report: What demonstrates delivery against the plan?
AI Agent for Report Acceptance. Research reports, during implementation and at the final report.
The agent reads the report and annexes against the approved contract, plan, milestones and expected results. It checks what is due for the period, follows supporting evidence and groups gaps for review.
Applicable ГОСТ 7.32-2017 checks and requirements established by the project's ГОСТ or СТ РК sources support formal review. Publication evidence and related deficiencies are checked and grouped; corrections retain their history. The reviewer accepts or requests correction.
What changes for the reviewer: A clear comparison of approved commitments, reported results and supporting evidence.
Corrected reports return to review.
Toward a connected science ecosystem.
Screen Flow starts with application review and reporting. Its direction is a shared automation hub for researchers, institutions, NCSTE and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, with each participant retaining its responsibilities.
Automation that moves work forward
- Evidence appears to be missing: Search the available material
- Related issues need correction: Prepare one coordinated request
- A substantive decision remains: Bring the evidence to the responsible person
A shared AI foundation.
Reusable capabilities support the current agents and are designed to extend to more scientific processes through connections with institutional and government systems.
- Document understanding: Reads documents, scans, tables and annexes and makes their evidence usable.
- Evidence investigation: Finds supporting material and resolves gaps before asking for information again.
- Scholarly evidence: Connects publication, author and journal records with their supporting sources.
- Scientific duplication detection: Prepares a substantive comparison of research goals, tasks, novelty and expected results.
- Methodology Studio: Turns approved source clauses into editable rule drafts for methodology authors.
Automation for the work. Evidence for decisions.
Open a finding, inspect its sources and ask the agent to explain it. Compare corrections and follow each decision into the report. Researchers and responsible specialists keep their focus on the questions that matter.
- The requirement it applies
- The evidence it relies on
- Why it remains unresolved
- Your decision and its reason
Preparation continues with the available material. Missing information, contradictions and unavailable checks are visible, with supported work retained and recoverable gaps rechecked.
From applications to demonstrated results.
Explore the agents working today. The broader direction connects scientific priorities, approved commitments, research results and evidence of their use and contribution.